Can a party withdraw its consent to an agreement under Article 11? Maybe. As decided in ExxonMobil Corp. v. Valence Operating Co., a party may revoke its agreement under Rule 11 at any time prior to the transfer of the judgment. But even then, a court is not precluded from enforcing an agreement under Rule 11 as soon as the agreement has been rejected by one of the parties. There is often a dispute over the importance or interpretation of an agreement under Article 11. In such a controversy, a court will consider an agreement under Rule 11 like any other written contract. The main objective of the Tribunal in the interpretation of a written contract is to identify and fulfil the intentions that the parties have objectively presented as a pretext in the written document. Inclusion in [subject matter of contract] constitutes an agreement between the parties in accordance with Rule 11 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Because Texas has passed the uniform Electronic Transactions Act (which states that “[i]t] if the law requires a signature, an electronic signature is in compliance with the law), Texas courts note that your electronic signature is a signed writing in the context of Rule 11. The first step is to conclude a formal agreement in accordance with Article 11. The Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 11 provides that no agreement is enforced between attorneys or parties involved in an ongoing action unless it is written, signed, and filed with the documents as part of the minutes or is entered into and recorded in a public court.
. . .